منابع مشابه
Some Comparisons among Quadratic, Spherical, and Logarithmic Scoring Rules
S proper scoring rules continue to play an important role in probability assessment. Although many such rules have been developed, relatively little guidance exists as to which rule is the most appropriate. In this paper, we discuss two important properties of quadratic, spherical, and logarithmic scoring rules. From an ex post perspective, we compare their rank order properties and conclude th...
متن کاملLogarithmic Market Scoring Rules for Modular Combinatorial Information Aggregation
In practice, scoring rules elicit good probability estimates from individuals, while betting markets elicit good consensus estimates from groups. Market scoring rules combine these features, eliciting estimates from individuals or groups, with groups costing no more than individuals. Regarding a bet on one event given another event, only logarithmic versions preserve the probability of the give...
متن کاملEfforts in favor of health
Undoubtedly, the initiative of the demarches which are responsible, visible and benefic for “Health-NutritionWellbeing” belong to Prof. Florian Popa, MD, Vice-president of the Health Commission of the Senate of Romania and the President of the National Council of Attesting the Titles, Diplomas and University Certificates in Medicine, at that time, Rector of “Carol Davila” University of Medicine...
متن کاملAn Argument in Favor
We argue in favor of the presumed c o m m i t protocol by proposing two new presumed commit variants that sign$cantly reduce the cost of logging activities associated with the original presumed commit protocol. Furthermore, for read-only transactions, we apply our unsolicited updatevote optim’zationand show that the cost associated with this type of transactions is the same in both presumed com...
متن کاملEliciting Honest Feedback Empirical Results for Quadratic and Logarithmic Scoring Rules
Electronic markets face the challenge of motivating honest feedback from strangers who have limited interaction with each other. Miller, Resnick and Zeckhauser [3] propose a mechanism for eliciting truthful evaluations by providing monetary incentives. However, their paper does not present valuable empirical data that would help one better understand their system. For example, knowing how noise...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophy of Science
سال: 2019
ISSN: 0031-8248,1539-767X
DOI: 10.1086/702028